Uncategorized

UWA Executive Salaries

This is an extract from a letter published in The Post in March 2016
In recent months, the Executive at The University of Western Australia has come under fire for some of their decisions and public behaviours. This was most striking in relation to the announcement made by the Vice Chancellor Paul Johnson, two weeks prior to Christmas (and, perhaps more importantly, prior to any of the consultation legally required by the Enterprise
Agreement with Academic staff) of their decision to make 300 staff members (200 professional staff and 100 academic staff) redundant. This is the so-­called? ‘renewal project’.
[wpdm_package id=’1091′]

UWA Executive Salaries Read More »

Requesting the Academic Faculty Evaluation Models by Professor Raymond da Silva Rosa

Following a resolution passed at the UWAASA Forum on methods used at UWA to evaluate academic staff, I  have  requested a copy of the model used in each Faculty from the Senior Deputy Vice-Chancellor. As noted in the letter, those at the meeting believed it would be useful to review and compare the approaches.

Requesting the Academic Faculty Evaluation Models by Professor Raymond da Silva Rosa Read More »

A Question to the SDVC from Dr Tony Hughes d’Aeth concerning the Renewal Project

“My question concerns the level of optimum subsidy to be paid from teaching to research in a University as outlined by the Vice Chancellor: My question, though, is what is the best level for this subsidy and how is this determined and monitored? To this end, what are the econometric indicia used by UWA to set this subsidy and what are the measures of its benefit and costs?”[wpdm_package id=’1105′]

A Question to the SDVC from Dr Tony Hughes d’Aeth concerning the Renewal Project Read More »

The UWAASA Committee writes to the Chancellor and V-C about the Renewal Project

The UWAASA Committee has written an open letter to the UWA Chancellor and Vice-Chancellor, requesting further information about the Renewal Project. Prior to dispatch, the letter was circulated to as many academic staff as possible in a short time frame for signature. “We, the academic staff, are committed to the long-term success and viability of The University of Western Australia, to the communities it serves, and to its role as both a regional and international institution of note. The UWA Executive has put forward a proposal for the renewal of our university, but we know such a project can succeed only with the broad-based support and engagement of all staff.” Please download the letter.[wpdm_package id=’1111′]

The UWAASA Committee writes to the Chancellor and V-C about the Renewal Project Read More »

To SDVC Dawn Freshwater from a UWAASA Member re Project Renewal

Staff were invited to make submissions about Project Renewal. This is one such letter from a concerned academic. “The proposal for change focuses on three areas. An Academic Restructure, a Methodology for Evaluating Academic Roles, and Professional Services Delivery. I will focus my attention on the appended section entitled Methodology for Evaluating Academic Roles, then make some comments about the rationale for the Renewal Project, and finish with an alternative suggestion on how the savings could be achieved.” Please download to read in full. [wpdm_file id=50]

To SDVC Dawn Freshwater from a UWAASA Member re Project Renewal Read More »

Feedback to the Executive’s response to financial problems and to the Academic restructuring from a UWAASA Committee member

“I will address the issues of financial remedies and academic restructuring sequentially as I remain unclear about any “necessary” links between the two (but am open to being presented with evidence that will enlighten me). These are merely my thoughts on the issues as I do NOT believe that we have been given adequate information on which to make judgements on the general direction in which the Executive propose moving, let along substantive, well- argued suggestions for better responses”. Please download the full submission. [wpdm_file id=49]

Feedback to the Executive’s response to financial problems and to the Academic restructuring from a UWAASA Committee member Read More »

Assoc Prof R Pitty’s submission on Restructuring

1. It is evident from the information meetings about the Renewal process and from UWA ASA and NTEU meetings about the process that there is a legitimacy crisis at UWA, which the Executive may perceive dimly or without clarity about its scope.
2. This statement may be dismissed as an opinion rather than a fact but there is one way of verifying which it is. The reality could be ascertained readily if the Executive uses online technology (which it has promoted in the teaching environment) to find out the extent of support amongst UWA staff for the Renewal proposals. All that is needed is for an online and anonymous referendum on the proposals to be held. The details of the question would need to be worked out cooperatively with UWA ASA for the referendum itself to have legitimacy. The results of the referendum would need to be reported to staff immediately, as for any credible democratic process. [wpdm_file id=53]

Assoc Prof R Pitty’s submission on Restructuring Read More »

Prof Tim Mazzarol responds to mooted changes to UWA’s Senate

The democratic governance of UWA is an important issue and all staff should be concerned to protect it if possible. No system is perfect but if we simply remain passive over such issues, either because we are fearful of consequences for speaking up, or because we are apathetic, we risk finding ourselves being placed into an organisational environment that we may not find is in our best interests. [wpdm_file id=45]

Prof Tim Mazzarol responds to mooted changes to UWA’s Senate Read More »

Scroll to Top